Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Eclipse Photography

Abstract

FROM letters I have received, it appears that the table of exposures given in my “Notes” is not correctly understood. It is necessary to explain again that the reason why the plate exposed 8 secs. gave a better result than the one exposed 30 secs. was because the eclipsed sun was nearly covered by cloud during the long exposure, and was quite clear during the short. The 30 secs. plate would have been greatly over-exposed for certain details, but the outer corona would probably have been more clearly defined. By giving some plates short and others long exposures, it was intended to show different effects, as would certainly have been the case if we had been favoured with a cloudless sky.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BROTHERS, A. Eclipse Photography. Nature 4, 367 (1871). https://doi.org/10.1038/004367c0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/004367c0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing