Abstract
I AGREE with Mr. Proctor that the disuse of the term “position” in geometry would be a serious misfortune; happily, however, it is not its disuse, but the prevention of its misuse which is contemplated. I cannot agree with him that “position” is a word “which no one can misunderstand,” for his own letter is a striking example of its being misunderstood, either by Mr. Proctor, or by others. “Aspect and slope,” he tells us, “indicate two elements, which, together, fix the position” of a plane. Geometers, however, certainly understand, when a plane is said to be given in position, that something more than its aspect and slope may be regarded as known. Parallel planes have necessarily the same slope and aspect, but surely not the same position. To be told that, because its slope and aspect are invariable, the plane of Saturn's rings has a fixed position in space, notwithstanding that the planet moves bodily in its orbit, would scarcely satisfy a student of astronomy accustomed to geometrical precision.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HIRST, T. A Plane's Aspect. Nature 5, 7 (1871). https://doi.org/10.1038/005007d0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/005007d0


