Abstract
IV.
IT has already been pointed out how unsatisfactory in 1 some respects were the results of the observations made in 1761. Those of the year 1769 were more suc-1 cessful, but the discrepancies of different observers still threw a doubt on the result. After Encke had discussed with all possible care the observations made upon these two occasions,! doubts were still raised as to the correctness of the value thus found for the solar parallax. The reasons of these doubts were manifold. In the first place in order to get any value whatever of the solar parallax, Encke had been forced to assume that enormous errors had been committed by some of the observers; and again, all the other methods of which we have spoken were found to give a tolerably accordant value of the solar parallax, but values that differed considerably from Encke's determination.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
FORBES, G. The Coming Transit of Venus † . Nature 10, 27–30 (1874). https://doi.org/10.1038/010027a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/010027a0