Abstract
MAN very long ago, probably about the time he became man, reflected that he felt and thought ; since then no one has ever had the least doubt, as to whether a given object of thought was a fact of mind or of body ; and every attempt to resolve the one into the other has been but the vain enterprise of a misguided intelligence. The physical and mental stand over against each other—the fundamental duality of being which no effort of thought has been able to transcend. How, after reflecting that they felt, our far-off ancestors came to refer their feelings and reflections to a soul or spiritual entity, which they supposed to inhabit and animate the body, to cause and direct its movements, can never be more than a subject of speculation. But that such was the universal belief of mankind, that such is still the creed of all save a few, and that all language has been evolved under this conception, scarcely requires to be stated. For ages the curious speculated around the fascinating mystery of the union of soul and body—and yet the mystery remained. A slow change of view, however, was taking place. From the belief that the life and movement, the health and disease of the body, were in some way directly dependent on a conscious, thinking soul, we have passed gradually, very gradually, to the view held by that body of thinkers who claim to be the scientific psychologists of the present day, which is, that mind, feeling, and thought, in a word, consciousness, is dependent on bodily organisation. Dr. Maudsley presents the volume before us as a treatise or “disquisition, by the light of existing knowledge, concerning the nervous structures and functions which are the probable physical foundations, or the objective aspects of, those natural phenomena which appear in consciousness as feelings and thoughts, and are known only in that way.”
The Physiology of Mind.
Being the First Part of a Third Edition, Revised, Enlarged, and in great part Re-written, of “The Physiology and Pathology of Mind.” By Henry Maudsley (London: Macmillan and Co., 1876.)
Enjoying our latest content?
Log in or create an account to continue
- Access the most recent journalism from Nature's award-winning team
- Explore the latest features & opinion covering groundbreaking research
or
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SPALDING, D. Maudsley's “Physiology of Mind” . Nature 14, 541–543 (1876). https://doi.org/10.1038/014541a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/014541a0
jansand
As someone, from his earliest memories, most curious as to the nature of reality and just precisely what reality might be, I have found the immense variety of theories on the matter more puzzling than clarifying.
Modern thought on the matter is highly directed to the general concept that what is termed reality is an assembly of coherent sense memories and abstract inter-relationships thereon into a dynamic mosaic that permits predictions of consequences for interactions with some reliability. Many of the components of this mosaic are the results of individual experience and many are theoretical presumptions out of tradition and mutually accepted common beliefs. Since every living creature, human or otherwise, varies hugely in the range of these experiences, there is no possibility that there will be an absolute congruence between individuals even of the same species or cultures, although, in this latter case, sufficient matches between individuals can permit common agreements for the constructions of common social relationships. From this I can only conclude that, whatever the universe may offer for contemplation, just what selection of these offerings may be acknowledged and used to construct an individual version of reality carries a possibility of such wide variation that no absolute and total agreement on reality becomes acceptable universally.