Abstract
ONE of the most formidable objections to the theory of evolution is the enormous length of time which it demands. On this point Prof. Haeckel, one of the highest authorities on the subject, in his “History of Creation,” has the following:—“Darwin's theory, as well that of Lyell, renders the assumption of immense periods absolutely necessary. … If the theory of development be true at all there must certainly have elapsed immense periods, utterly inconceivable to us, during which the gradual historical development of the animal and vegetable proceeded by the slow transformation of species … the periods during which species originated by gradual transmutation, must not be calculated by single centuries, but by hundreds and by millions of centuries. Every process of development is the more intelligible the longer it is assumed to last.”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CROLL, J. Age of the Sun in Relation to Evolution . Nature 17, 206–207 (1878). https://doi.org/10.1038/017206a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/017206a0