Abstract
IT is surely no argument against Prof, Clerk Maxwell's notion, that in the epistle (James i. 17) the enclitic particle τε is omitted. Read, of course, Πάσα δóις τ άγαθή καί πάε δώρημα τέλειου, and the verse is perfect. The practice of omitting a word (or part of a word) necessary to the scansion of a verse is all too common with prosists quoting poetry. I give one example from an English writer. Robert Greene, the earliest to allude to Shakespeare, in his “Groatsworth of Wit bought with a Million of Repentance” (1692), quotes, just as if they were, prose, six lines from a contemporary poet; and in so doing inserts two words and omits two and part of another! He writes, as prose, omitting all that I here give in italics—
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
INGLEBY, C. The “Hexameter”, . Nature 21, 81 (1879). https://doi.org/10.1038/021081c0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/021081c0