Abstract
WITH regard to Mr. W. Clement Ley's remarks, I have already been permitted to explain in NATURE (vol. xxvii. p. 366) how I had accidentally misunderstood Mr. Airy's meaning. I do not believe that any bird having a greater specific gravity than the air can retain a perfectly fixed position in a calm without some wing-motion. Mr. Ley “believes that there is nothing in the etymology of the word ‘hover’ that implies movement.” This has induced me to look up a somewhat voluminous and recent dictionary, in which I find “Hover, v.i. (W. hoviaw, to hang over, to fluctuate, to hover). To flap the wings, fluttering or flapping the wings with short irregular flights”; and more to the same effect, all indicating movement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RAE, J. Hovering of Birds. Nature 27, 434 (1883). https://doi.org/10.1038/027434e0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/027434e0


