Abstract
THE House of Commons divided last Monday afternoon upon the Chingford and High Beech Railway Bill. An amendment was proposed by Mr. Bryce, Chairman of the Commons Preservation Society, and was supported by Mr. Thorold Rogers, Sir H. J. Selwin-Ibbetson, who framed the Epping Forest Act of 1878, Mr. Fowler, Mr. Firth, Mr. T. C. Baring, Lord Eustace Cecil, Mr. Ritchie, Mr. James, Mr. Caine, and Mr. Waddy. As a fitting sequel to Mr. Meldola's paper, which we published last week, the result of the division, which was announced amidst cheers, was: For the second reading, 82; against it, 230; majority against the Bill, 148. It is to be hoped that this will be the last attempt to tamper with what Mr. Bryce justly described as “a priceless heritage of the people of London.”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BOULGER, G. Epping Forest . Nature 27, 455–456 (1883). https://doi.org/10.1038/027455a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/027455a0