Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News
  • Published:

Epping Forest

Abstract

THE House of Commons divided last Monday afternoon upon the Chingford and High Beech Railway Bill. An amendment was proposed by Mr. Bryce, Chairman of the Commons Preservation Society, and was supported by Mr. Thorold Rogers, Sir H. J. Selwin-Ibbetson, who framed the Epping Forest Act of 1878, Mr. Fowler, Mr. Firth, Mr. T. C. Baring, Lord Eustace Cecil, Mr. Ritchie, Mr. James, Mr. Caine, and Mr. Waddy. As a fitting sequel to Mr. Meldola's paper, which we published last week, the result of the division, which was announced amidst cheers, was: For the second reading, 82; against it, 230; majority against the Bill, 148. It is to be hoped that this will be the last attempt to tamper with what Mr. Bryce justly described as “a priceless heritage of the people of London.”

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BOULGER, G. Epping Forest . Nature 27, 455–456 (1883). https://doi.org/10.1038/027455a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/027455a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing