Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sand

Abstract

As explained in my note on p. 245, I had not the advantage of perusing Mr. Waller's paper on “Sand.” Mr. Gardner, in his notice of it gave the first place to “distinguishing with certainty by the aid of the microscope sand that has been worn by the action of wind from sand that has been for long exposed to surf, and this again from sand brought down from torrents.” I assumed this was its primary object. In this I am in error. Mr. Waller says his “paper was to show that chalk flints had scarcely any place in the formation of sand.” Had I known this was the purpose of his writing I would not have troubled you with any remarks, as I entirely agree with Mr. Gardner when he says, as in p. 225: “The coast-line occupied by flint shingle is almost limited to portions of Western Europe, and is relatively insignificant.”

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MELVIN, J. Sand. Nature 28, 344 (1883). https://doi.org/10.1038/028344c0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/028344c0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing