Abstract
I HAVE long ago learnt not to look for any fair recognition of my work in seismometry on the part of Prof. John Milne, and when he accuses me of appropriating without acknowledgment the work of others it is time to decline further controversy with him. The points raised in his last communication (NATURE, April 14, p. 559) are sufficiently answered in mine of December 11 (p. 172). I there quoted part of a letter written by Prof. Chaplin, now of Harvard University, then of Tokio, and Secretary of the Seismological Society of Japan, under whose eyes the events occurred to which Prof. Milne refers. I did not quote the whole of Prof. Chaplin's letter, because it contained sentences I was unwilling to give except under the strongest provocation. After referring to my seismograph in the words already quoted (p. 172), Prof. Chaplin continues:—
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
EWING, J. Seismometers. Nature 35, 606 (1887). https://doi.org/10.1038/035606a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/035606a0


