Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Seismometers

Abstract

I HAVE long ago learnt not to look for any fair recognition of my work in seismometry on the part of Prof. John Milne, and when he accuses me of appropriating without acknowledgment the work of others it is time to decline further controversy with him. The points raised in his last communication (NATURE, April 14, p. 559) are sufficiently answered in mine of December 11 (p. 172). I there quoted part of a letter written by Prof. Chaplin, now of Harvard University, then of Tokio, and Secretary of the Seismological Society of Japan, under whose eyes the events occurred to which Prof. Milne refers. I did not quote the whole of Prof. Chaplin's letter, because it contained sentences I was unwilling to give except under the strongest provocation. After referring to my seismograph in the words already quoted (p. 172), Prof. Chaplin continues:—

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

EWING, J. Seismometers. Nature 35, 606 (1887). https://doi.org/10.1038/035606a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/035606a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing