Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

How not to Teach Geometry

Abstract

As I have come across an almost unforeseen development of the above heading, I take the liberty of bringing it before your readers. For myself I may state that I have considered the “learn a proposition off by heart” method was sufficiently bad, but what is to be made of the method described in the following extract from a note which I recently received from my friend:— “We have half of a proposition written on the board, and then we write it at home from memory; then the other half is written on the board, and we write that at home from memory. Then we have to learn the whole proposition at once, to be able to write or say it with different letters. We are not allowed to have a printed Euclid book—we are only allowed to have a book of Enunciations.”

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WOODALL, H. How not to Teach Geometry. Nature 41, 60 (1889). https://doi.org/10.1038/041060a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/041060a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing