Abstract
IN his excellent article on the extermination of the American bison, “R. L.” remarks (NATURE, p. 11) on the transatlantic practice of miscalling that animal a “buffalo”; but on the next page he writes of “its European congener the Lithuanian aurochs.” This is to perpetuate a common error at least as bad. The “aurochs” (= ox of yore), Latinized by Cæsar in the form urus, is or was the Bos primigenius or B. urus of scientific nomenclature. It is wholly by mistake that in its extinction as a wild animal its ancient name was transferred to the bison, or Zubr. I would invite “R. L.” to turn to the word “Bison” in Dr. Murray's “New English Dictionary,” where he will find a reference to an article “Wisunt” in Schade's “Altdeutsches Wörterbuch,” which ought to settle the question. I only wish one could ascertain to what animal the name “buffalo” strictly belongs. There unfortunately Dr. Murray does not help us.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others

Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
NEWTON, A. Bison not Aurochs. Nature 42, 28 (1890). https://doi.org/10.1038/042028c0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/042028c0

