Abstract
REFERRING to Prof. Henslow's paper on “A Theory of Heredity based on Forces” (November 26, p. 93), the behaviour of grafted plants seems to require, for its explanation, the possession by both stock and graft of something analogous to a distinct individuality, call it what we may. It is difficult enough to understand, especially in the case of nearly-related forms, why the stock generally has no, or so little, influence on the graft; but, assuming the absence of individuality, the difficulty is largely increased. The graft takes its nourishment through the stock, and yet retains its characteristics unimpaired. I argue from this that not only does the graft possess an individuality of its own, but that this is so marked that it can take its nourishment direct from the stock, while at the same time straining out, as it were, whatever it is that constitutes the individuality of the stock. The phenomena presented by parasitic plants seem to bear out this view.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BEEBY, W. Grafted Plants.. Nature 45, 151 (1891). https://doi.org/10.1038/045151c0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/045151c0


