Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

“The Grammar of Science”

Abstract

To the vast majority of readers, chapter ix. of the “Grammar of Science” will probably seem to be simply a plea in favour of the doctrine of evolution in its purest form. We were not called upon to express any opinion as to the merits of this doctrine, nor did we. What struck us (and still strikes us) as fundamentally illogical, was the formulation of a theory, which, itself avowedly a mental product, proceeded to picture a universe devoid of sentient beings, or, in the phraseology of the “ Grammar,” a conceptual world evolving the perceptive faculty which creates it. An evolution theory which postulates spontaneous generation and human automatonism is natural to the materialist; and hence our contention that, in spite of the general character of the argument in the earlier chapters of the book, certain conclusions are distinctly materialistic.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

K., C. “The Grammar of Science”. Nature 46, 221–222 (1892). https://doi.org/10.1038/046221d0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/046221d0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing