Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Laws of Error in Drawing

Abstract

I SHOULD be obliged if you allow me to state in the next issue of NATURE, to prevent any misconception of the extent of those “compulsory errors” alluded to in my article printed in the current number, that I am able to specify such, with equal particularity, as they occur in the following additional figures, viz.:—The cylinder, the ringed cylinder, the oblong, the octagon, cone, hexagonal pyramid, octagonal pyramid, triangle (solid). Also in those figures framed of square-sectioned woodwork that have the following shapes, viz. square, cross, triangle, arch, hexagon, pentagon, circle. Again, that they are observable in all forms which are complexities of the primal forms above given; and, moreover, I have traced them clearly in the draughtsmanship of Orientals, and even in the drawing of the greatest painters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HADDON, A. Laws of Error in Drawing. Nature 48, 416 (1893). https://doi.org/10.1038/048416f0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/048416f0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing