Abstract
Is it quite correct, as Prof. Lodge puts it, to call the X-rays anodic because they start from a point (surface of glass, or of metal foil, &c.) opposite the kathode? It may be true that a surface upon which the kathodic discharges are being directed acquires thereby some properties common to the anode: but it is not an actual anode. Further, I think that so far there is no proof that these rays start from an anode unless that anode is itself in the line of the kathodic discharge. Hence I submit that anti-kathodic would be a more correct term to use in describing them. They can certainly be made to start from a portion of the kathode itself by shaping it so as to concentrate the kathodic discharges (or “radiant matter”) upon a prolongation of itself.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
THOMPSON, S. The Röntgen Rays. Nature 53, 437 (1896). https://doi.org/10.1038/053437a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/053437a0