Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Heating of Anodes in X-Ray Tubes

Abstract

IN reply to Mr. Walter Chamberlain's inquiry (p, 198), it must be borne in mind that spark length is not per se a criterion of the energy delivered to a vacuum tube. The length of spark is more or less proportionate to the maximum E.M.F. of the discharge, while the energy of a discharge depends upon the nature of the curves of both E.M.F. and current, and may bear but a small relation to the maximum E.M.F. Large coils which have secondary wire of considerable section and comparatively large electrostatic capacity, give a much greater electric quantity and, consequently, much more energy for each discharge, even when worked so as to give only short of arks, than do smaller coils the secondary wire of which is of smaller section and capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SWINTON, A. The Heating of Anodes in X-Ray Tubes. Nature 55, 225 (1897). https://doi.org/10.1038/055225a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/055225a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing