Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Liquid Hydrogen

Abstract

MR. HAMPSON seems insatiable of contradictions. He has produced a vast quantity of irrelevancies with which I have no concern. But I have denied the accusations he brings against me, and every single statement of his that is relevant. Yet he still complains that I do not deny enough. It is absolutely false to say that I appropriated or profited by any plan, idea, or statement of Mr. Hampson's, either directly or indirectly. I was never informed of his visit, far less of any of the plans he brought to the Royal Institution, nor would anything have induced me to look at them. I have been long enough in this “temple of science” not to know what that might involve. Mr. Hampson got at my assistant behind my back, and persuaded him to look at the plans. I infer from the public correspondence, that he saw that they would not work, and he told Mr. Hampson why they were unworkable.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DEWAR, J. Liquid Hydrogen. Nature 58, 270 (1898). https://doi.org/10.1038/058270a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/058270a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing