Abstract
IN the original classification of the sciences for the purposes of the projected Royal Society Catalogue of Scientific Literature, Psychology was given an independent place. Recognising this, the International Psychological Congress at Munich, in 1896, appointed an English committee to do what they could to further the scheme in the name of the Congress. Following this, Dr. G. F. Stout, editor of Mind, then at Aberdeen, now at Oxford, was asked by Prof. Michael Foster to prepare a schedule for psychology. Dr. Stout sought the collaboration of the present writer, who represented the Psychological Review and its annual catalogue the Psychological Index. In the meantime, at the suggestion of Prof. Foster to the present writer, the question had come up in America as to the advisability of suspending our Index (which is now common to the Zeitsch. f. Psychologies Berlin, and the Année Psychologique, Paris), with the preliminary understanding that if the Royal Society Catalogue issued an adequate list in psychology, it would be advisable to suspend the publication of the Index and support the Catalogue. Dr. Stout submitted the schedule he had prepared.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BALDWIN, J. The Royal Society Catalogue and Psychology. Nature 61, 226–227 (1899). https://doi.org/10.1038/061226a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/061226a0