Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Natural History Museum—A Correction

Abstract

IN a paper of mine on Ilyopsyllus coriaceus, which appeared recently in the Natural History Transactions of Northumberland and Durham, I referred to certain dissections—which had been described by Mr. Thomas Scott, and are now in the Natural History Museum at South Kensington—as having “deteriorated so as to be useless,” at the same time ascribing this statement to Prof. T. Jeffrey Bell, who had kindly examined the dissections at my request. The statement, so far as Prof. Bell's authority is concerned, is not quite accurate, and at his request I wish to be allowed to correct it in your columns. What Prof. Bell told me was that the dissections consist of “nothing but unrecognisable fragments,” and that “Mr. Pocock, who had charge of the Crustacea in 1893, says the tube came there in the state it is in now.”

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BRADY, G. The Natural History Museum—A Correction. Nature 61, 540 (1900). https://doi.org/10.1038/061540c0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/061540c0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing