Abstract
ON p. 15 of NATURE of May 1, it is stated that Herr Hugo Bretzl, in a thesis for his Doctorate at Strassburg, has shown that “the Greeks realised such facts as the absence of the pine in all the countries which intervene between Macedonia and India.” That this statement is erroneous is proved by the following facts relating to the distribution of Macedonian and other species of Pinus in the countries alluded to. P. Pinea, Anatolia and Syria; P. sylvestris, Asia Minor, the Caucasus and Tauria; P. halepensis, Anatolia, Transcaucasia, Syria; P. Brutia, Asia Minor, the Lebanon, N. Persia; P. Laricio, Asia Minor. To these should be added various species of Picea and Abies, which the Greeks may have included under Pinus.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HOOKER, J. The Pines of Western Asia. Nature 66, 53 (1902). https://doi.org/10.1038/066053c0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/066053c0


