Abstract
IN his letter on this subject published in NATURE of May 3 (p. 8) Mr. G. C. Simpson is, I venture to think, under a misapprehension regarding the conditions which determine the variations of the earth's electric field. His statement of the problem, which I have slightly abbreviated, is as follows:—“It is usual to accept that there is a negative charge on the earth's surface, and the corresponding positive charge is a volume charge distributed in the atmosphere. There is very little volume charge in the air close to the earth's surface, so the relation between potential gradient and charge on the earth's surface is given by dv/dh= – 4πσ. Hence it follows that with a given charge on the earth's surface and the corresponding charge in the atmosphere above, the vertical distribution of the charge and the conducting state of the upper atmosphere do not in the slightest affect the potential gradient within a few metres of the earth's surface.”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RICHARDSON, O. Diurnal Variation of the Ionisation in Closed Vessels. Nature 74, 55 (1906). https://doi.org/10.1038/074055a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/074055a0


