Abstract
IT is desirable to direct attention to Prof. R. W. Wood's most important paper in the Philosophical Magazine for December, 1908, on a method of showing fluorescent absorption directly if it exists; but it seems certain that he has, at the end, drawn a conclusion from his experiments the very opposite, as I venture to think, to that to which they really lead. He compares the light apparently transmitted by a fluorescent body when fluorescence is, and is not, taking place, and finds that there is no difference in the resultant effect. This, I think, is as it should be; but the inference he draws is that there is no difference in the absorption. For my part I must admit that it only confirms my results published in the Philosophical Transactions, vol. cxci., A, 1898, that there is such an absorption; for if there were none such the light apparently transmitted would be less when the body is not fluorescing, owing to the fact that the fluorescent light would increase the apparent transmission, and a flickering should ensue; but Wood's experiment demonstrates that this is not so. The inference I should draw, then, is that during fluorescence there is an increased absorption of the light transmitted.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BURKE, J. On Fluorescence Absorption. Nature 82, 279 (1910). https://doi.org/10.1038/082279b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/082279b0


