Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Hot Days in 1911

Abstract

MR. MACDOWALL'S letter in NATURE of October 12 (p. 485), in which he directs attention to certain features in the sequence of annual number of hot days at Greenwich, is interesting. Nevertheless, I think he himself will acknowledge that his example, viz. the summer of 1911, is a happy one. What his diagram would lead one to expect if one were making a forecast, and not a retrospect, is that the number of hot days in 1911 would lie between his lower limit of 90 days and an upper limit of about 90+130, or 220 days; the value half-way between the two, i.e. 155 days, being the “ost probable” Clearly in this case the upper limit, and also the most probable value, may be disregarded, and the lower limit is sufficiently high to be worthy of note.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CORLESS, R. Hot Days in 1911. Nature 87, 515–516 (1911). https://doi.org/10.1038/087515b0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/087515b0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing