Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Treatment and control of hypertension in Turkish population: a survey on high blood pressure in primary care (the TURKSAHA study)

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 20, pages 355–361 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Although the management and the control rates of hypertension are generally low throughout the world, there are substantial differences between the countries. The aim of this study was to determine the control rate of blood pressure and the characteristics of the patients who have been admitted to primary care units in Turkey. Our study included 16 270 patients aged above 18 years who were diagnosed as hypertensive in representative nationwide sample of 1000 primary care units in Turkey. The mean age of the patients was 60±11 years (60.1% women). Of 16 270 patients, 15 187 (93.3%) were on an antihypertensive treatment, whereas 1083 (6.7%) were receiving no treatment. The patients who were women, diabetic, smoker, obese, and those who had a concomitant cardiovascular disease (CVD) had a higher rate of antihypertensive treatment. Of 15 187 treated patients, 4912 (30.2%) had a controlled systolic blood pressure, 7063 (43.4%) a controlled diastolic blood pressure, and in 3931 (24.2%), both were under control. A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age (OR 1.33), diabetes (OR 4.96), body mass index (OR 1.41) and the presence of a CVD (OR 1.19) were predictors for blood pressure being under control. The blood pressure control rates ranged between 16.6 and 30.5% among seven geographical regions. In the primary care units in Turkey, the blood pressure control rate is consistently low in treated hypertensive patients. In addition, there are differences between the geographical regions in both the proportion of those receiving medications and the blood pressure control rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hajjar I, Kotchen TA . Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA 2003; 290: 199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Kramer H, Banegas JR, Giampaoli S, Joffres MR et al. Hypertension treatment and control in five European countries, Canada, and the United States. Hypertension 2004; 43: 10–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pavlik VN, Hyman DJ, Vallbona C, Toronio C, Louis K . Hypertension awareness and control in an inner-city African–American sample. J Hum Hypertens 1997; 11: 277–283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Borzecki AM, Wong AT, Hickey EC, Ash AS, Berlowitz DR . Hypertension control: how well are we doing? Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2705–2711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meissner I, Whisnant JP, Sheps SG, Schwartz GL, O'Fallon WM, Covalt JL et al. Detection and control of high blood pressure in the community: do we need a wake-up call? Hypertension 1999; 34: 466–471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Onat A, Şenocak M, Örnek E, Gözükara Y, Surdum-Avc G, Karaaslan Y et al. Investigations survey on prevalence of cardiac disease and its risk factors in adults in Turkey: 5. hypertension and smoking. Arch Turk Soc Cardiol 1991; 19: 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Onat A, Sansoy V, Yıldırım B, Keleş İ, Çetinkaya A, Aksu H et al. Blood pressure levels in Turkish adults: 8-year trends, rate of treatment, relationship to other risk factors and to coronary disease. Arch Turk Soc Cardiol 1999; 27: 136–143.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Onat A, Doğan Y, Uyarel H, Ceyhan K, Uzunlar B, Yazıcı M et al. Blood pressure levels in Turkish adults: Initial trend to improved blood pressure control. Arch Turk Soc Cardiol 2002; 30: 748–757.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chamontin B, Poggi L, Lang T, Menard J, Chevalier H, Gallois H et al. Prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension in the French population data from a survey on high blood pressure in general practice, 1994. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11: 759–762.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chamontin B, Lang T, Vaisse B, Nicodeme R, Antoine MP, Lazorthes ML et al. Regional management of arterial hypertension in France. Report of a survey of general practitioners. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 2001; 94: 823–827.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Steckelings UM, Stoppelhaar M, Sharma AM, Wittchen HU, Krause P, Kupper B et al. HYDRA: possible determinants of unsatisfactory hypertension control in German primary care patients. Blood Press 2004; 13: 80–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grzybowski A, Bellwon J, Gruchala M, Stolarczyk L, Popaszkiewicz J, Sobizewski W et al. Effectiveness of hypertension treatment assessed by blood pressure level achieved in primary care setting in Poland. Blood Press 2003; 12: 232–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maue SK, Rivo ML, Weiss B, Farrelly EW, Brower-Stenger S . Effect of a primary care physician-focused, population-based approach to blood pressure control. Fam Med 2002; 34: 508–513.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ornstein SM, Nietert PJ, Dickerson LM . Hypertension management and control in primary care: a study of 20 practices in 14 states. Pharmacotherapy 2004; 24: 500–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma AM, Wittchen HU, Kirch W, Pittrow D, Ritz E, Goke B et al. High prevalence and poor control of hypertension in primary care: cross-sectional study. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 479–486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Majernick TG, Zacker C, Madden NA, Belletti DA, Arcona S . Correlates of hypertension control in a primary care setting. Am J Hypertens 2004; 17: 915–920.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lloyd-Jones DM, Evans JC, Larson MG, O'Donnell CJ, Roccella EJ, Levy D . Differential control of systolic and diastolic blood pressure:factors associated with lack of blood pressure control in the community. Hypertension 2000; 36: 594–599.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hyman DJ, Pavlik VN . Characteristics of patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the United States. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 479–486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Swales JD . Current status of hypertensive disease treatment: results from the Evaluation and Interventions for Systolic Blood pressure Elevation: Regional and Blobal (EISBERG) project. J Hypertens 1999; 17 (Suppl): S15–S19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Joffres MR, Hamet P, MacLean DR, L'italien GJ, Fodor G . Distribution of blood pressure and hypertension in Canada and the United States. Am J Hypertens 2001; 14: 1099–1105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Basile JN, Lackland DT, Basile JM, Riehle JE, Egan BM . A statewide primary care approach to cardiovascular risk factor control in high-risk diabetic and nondiabetic patients with hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2004; 6: 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to all physicians who participated in the data collection, without whom the present study would not have been possible. This study was funded by İbrahim Ethem-Menarini, Turkey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey

    A Abaci

  2. SSK Goztepe Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

    A Oguz

  3. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey

    O Kozan

  4. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey

    N Toprak

  5. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey

    H Senocak

  6. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey

    N Deger

  7. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, On Dokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey

    M Sahin

  8. Department of Biostatics, School of Medicine, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey

    H Sur

  9. Department of Experimental Medicine, Excellence Research Center on Cardiovascular Diseases, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy

    F Fici

  10. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

    C Erol

Authors
  1. A Abaci
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A Oguz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. O Kozan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N Toprak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H Senocak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. N Deger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M Sahin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. H Sur
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. F Fici
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. C Erol
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Abaci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abaci, A., Oguz, A., Kozan, O. et al. Treatment and control of hypertension in Turkish population: a survey on high blood pressure in primary care (the TURKSAHA study). J Hum Hypertens 20, 355–361 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001995

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001995

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links