Abstract
A MINERAL variously labelled johannite and uranopilite in collections has yielded to Messrs. E. S. Larsen and G. V. Brown the composition RO.UO3.SO3.4H2O, where R = Cu,Fe,Na2 (the American Mineralogist, vol. ii., p. 78, 1917). The new species thus indicated is called gilpinite, from the typical locality Gilpin Co., Colorado; but a Cornish specimen, one of those styled uranopilite, proves to be identical. The authors insist that optical tests under the microscope are characteristic, and that their application shows that more than one-third of the hundred specimens of “secondary uranium minerals” examined from various museums are incorrectly labelled.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
C., G. Recent Work in Mineralogy and Petrology . Nature 101, 174–175 (1918). https://doi.org/10.1038/101174b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/101174b0