Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News
  • Published:

Recent Work in Mineralogy and Petrology

Abstract

A MINERAL variously labelled johannite and uranopilite in collections has yielded to Messrs. E. S. Larsen and G. V. Brown the composition RO.UO3.SO3.4H2O, where R = Cu,Fe,Na2 (the American Mineralogist, vol. ii., p. 78, 1917). The new species thus indicated is called gilpinite, from the typical locality Gilpin Co., Colorado; but a Cornish specimen, one of those styled uranopilite, proves to be identical. The authors insist that optical tests under the microscope are characteristic, and that their application shows that more than one-third of the hundred specimens of “secondary uranium minerals” examined from various museums are incorrectly labelled.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

C., G. Recent Work in Mineralogy and Petrology . Nature 101, 174–175 (1918). https://doi.org/10.1038/101174b0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/101174b0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing