Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

On Langmuir's Theory of Atoms

Abstract

MR. S. C. BRADFORD'S criticism in NATURE of March 11 of Dr. Langmuir's theory is scarcely justifiable, considering that the latter clearly states in his paper (Journ. American Chem. Soc, vol. xli., p. 868, 1919) that the equilibrium positions of the electrons are determined in part by magnetic, and in part by electrostatic, forces, the former necessarily implying electron rotations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

OXLEY, A. On Langmuir's Theory of Atoms. Nature 105, 105 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1038/105105c0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/105105c0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing