Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

International Council for Fishery Investigations

Abstract

As the writer of the article on the above subject in NATURE of March 18, I should be disposed to allow Prof. McIntosh's letter in the issue of April 8 based on it to pass without comment if that letter had not been quoted extensively elsewhere. I merely remark that the professor's claim to maintain the same position as he took up in his published criticisms in 1902 and 1903 is fully substantiated. I see no reference in my article to the Moray Firth, which, indeed, had nothing to do with the International Council, and which I must leave Prof. McIntosh to settle with his fishery colleagues in Scotland. His criticism of the representatives of France is out of place, in that representatives of all countries are appointed by their Governments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Z., X. International Council for Fishery Investigations. Nature 105, 262–263 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1038/105262a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/105262a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing