Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Heredity

Abstract

IN his letter to NATURE of November 25 Sir Archdall Reid has ably stated some fundamental biological truths concerning heredity, and with many ot his statements I believe all biologists would agree. From the developmental point of view there is certainly a sense in which all characters are alike, arising as the result of the interplay of the germ and its environment, nature and nurture. In this limited sense it is doubtless beside the mark to inquire whether nature or nurture is more important, seeing that both are essential elements in any development at all. From this point of view it may be true, to cite Sir Archdall Reid's example, that there is no fundamental difference between the head and the scar; both may be in one sense germinal, and in another acquired.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GATES, R. Heredity. Nature 106, 440 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1038/106440b0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/106440b0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing