Abstract
MR. CLAYTON'S representation in NATURE of December 9 that, apart from seasonal and diurnal changes, the “chief, if not the only,” cause of weather change lies in solar variations overlooks an important source of variation in the atmosphere which could not be allowed for on the lines of his investigation. No one will dispute that if Mr. Clayton finally substantiates his correlation results, which have been severely criticised in America by Dr. C. F. Marvin (Monthly Weather Review, March, 1920) they will be of great value in forecasting deviations from the normal of particular elements, such as temperature and rainfall, in coming seasons. But they will not help us to foresee the actual sequence of atmospheric phases embodying the combination of all elements which we call weather; and it is the precise sequence of changes, not the departure of one or more elements from normal during a given period, which, after all, is the primary aim in weather forecasting.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BONACINA, L. Solar Variation and the Weather. Nature 106, 567 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1038/106567b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/106567b0


