Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Young's Interference Experiment

Abstract

IN connection with Dr. Houstoun's letter on this subject in NATURE of April 28, I may direct attention to a note by my father “On a Simple Interference Arrangement” (British Association Report, pp. 703–4, 1893; Collected Works, vol. iv., p. 76). The arrangement described is a tube with a single slit at one end and a double slit at the other. The double slit is ruled on silvered glass, and is much closer than Dr. Houstoun describes—about 1/10 mm., as nearly as I can estimate without pulling the apparatus to pieces. The slit at the other end is about 0.35 mm., and the length of the tube about 31 cm. The apparatus as originally described was intended to be used with the double slit placed close to the eye and the tube directed to a source of light such as a gas flame or the sky. Interference bands are then well seen.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RAYLEIGH Young's Interference Experiment. Nature 107, 298 (1921). https://doi.org/10.1038/107298a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/107298a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing