Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A Problem in Economics

Abstract

MANY economic applications of meteorology depend upon the use of forecasts in deciding whether or not to incur expense by taking precautions against some particular phenomenon which would cause damage. A good example is provided by forecasts of ground temperature in deciding whether to pay men to spread sacking over newly-laid concrete road surfaces which would be injured by frost. In the simplest form of such problems the three possible lines of action are (1) to take precautions only on occasions when the phenomenon is forecasted, (2) to take precautions on all occasions, (3) to take no precautions at all. It is of interest to examine the circumstances under which (1) is the most economical line of action.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BILHAM, E. A Problem in Economics. Nature 109, 341–342 (1922). https://doi.org/10.1038/109341c0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/109341c0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing