Abstract
THE decision of the Board of Trade Referee that calcium carbide is not a synthetic organic chemical is characterised by “H. E. A.” (NATURE, February 23, p. 230) as an offence against both chemical tradition and our chemical conscience. “H. E. A.” no doubt may claim to be the keeper of the chemical tradition and conscience of organic chemists, but I should like to dissociate myself personally from his custodianship. How any one can regard calcium carbide, a substance that gives calcium oxide as its sole solid product when moistened with water, as an organic chemical, or an electric furnace operation as the fundamental synthesis of organic chemistry, I cannot understand. What do they know of organic chemical synthesis who only the syntheses of organic chemists know?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SODDY, F. Calcium Carbide and the Board of Trade. Nature 109, 343 (1922). https://doi.org/10.1038/109343a0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/109343a0


