Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Insulin

Abstract

SIR WILLIAM BAYLISS'S article in NATURE of February 10, p. 188, displays an attitude of friendly criticism towards the Medical Research Council's policy, in expressing their willingness to accept assignment of the insulin patent from the University of Toronto. The fact that an observer so sympathetic, and having so many opportunities of ascertaining the true nature of the position, should give expression to doubt and disquiet, may well arouse misgiving in a wider circle. There are several points concerning which he is clearly under a misapprehension.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DALE, H. Insulin. Nature 111, 253–254 (1923). https://doi.org/10.1038/111253a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/111253a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing