Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Value of e/m

Abstract

IT is quite customary, at the present time, to use as the most probable value of e/m that derived by Paschen from spectroscopic data, as given by equations (12) and (13), page 272, and (15) and (16), page 275, of Sommerfeld's “Atombau,” third edition. Taking Paschen's own estimate of the error in RHe and RH, we have a probable error in e/m of about 0.2 per cent. But I have shown by a more detailed consideration of all available data (Physical Review, 17, 589, 1921) that Paschen's estimate of error for RH (±0.06) is certainly too small, and that the true probable error is nearer ±0.2. The latter figure leads to an error of 0.5 per cent in e/m, and the Paschen data, combined with the best data on atomic weights (4.002 and 1.0077 for He and H) result in e/m =1.768±0.009, where the error in RH has alone been considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BIRGE, R. The Value of e/m. Nature 111, 287–288 (1923). https://doi.org/10.1038/111287b0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/111287b0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing