Abstract
IT is quite customary, at the present time, to use as the most probable value of e/m that derived by Paschen from spectroscopic data, as given by equations (12) and (13), page 272, and (15) and (16), page 275, of Sommerfeld's “Atombau,” third edition. Taking Paschen's own estimate of the error in RHe and RH, we have a probable error in e/m of about 0.2 per cent. But I have shown by a more detailed consideration of all available data (Physical Review, 17, 589, 1921) that Paschen's estimate of error for RH (±0.06) is certainly too small, and that the true probable error is nearer ±0.2. The latter figure leads to an error of 0.5 per cent in e/m, and the Paschen data, combined with the best data on atomic weights (4.002 and 1.0077 for He and H) result in e/m =1.768±0.009, where the error in RH has alone been considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
BIRGE, R. The Value of e/m. Nature 111, 287–288 (1923). https://doi.org/10.1038/111287b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/111287b0