Abstract
IN NATURE for July 7, p. 10, Prof. Cole criticises “American authors” for using the term dinosaur, instead of clinging as he does to “deinosaur”. In a previous number of NATURE (July 1, 1922, p. 21) the reviewer of an article on the Deinodontidæ takes the authors to task for not using “what is now considered the more correct rendering of the Greek, as Dinodontidæ”. What can a poor American author do to be saved?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MATTHEW, W. Scientific Names of Greek Derivation. Nature 112, 241 (1923). https://doi.org/10.1038/112241b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/112241b0