Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A Substitute for the McLeod Gauge

Abstract

THE results of our experiments do not confirm Mr. Fleuss's statements (NATURE, July 5, p. 12). Even if the water vapour is always at a pressure less than its equilibrium vapour pressure at room temperature, the McLeod gauge reads low and usually inconsistently. The reason is, of course, to be found in the absorption of water by glass. Water vapour will condense on glass when its pressure is raised, even when the final pressure is no greater than 0.001 mm.; the amount that condenses increases with the time, so that the reading of the gauge depends on the rate at which the mercury is raised. All this is quite familiar to those who work with modern high vacuum apparatus; but Mr. Fleuss's statements, if unchallenged, might mislead some who are only beginning to acquire their experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CAMPBELL, N., RYDE, J. & DUDDING, B. A Substitute for the McLeod Gauge. Nature 114, 276 (1924). https://doi.org/10.1038/114276c0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/114276c0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing