Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Word “Scientist” or its Substitute

Abstract

REGARDING the inquiry contained in your letter, I would say that the word “scientist” has fully established itself in the written and spoken language of scientific workers as well as of non-scientific persons. It is, of course, when one stays to examine it, a hybrid, but like that other hybrid, the mule, it does useful work. After all, there are numbers of hybrid words in our language also doing useful work, and one does not now trouble to look them in the mouth. For example, take the Latin stems with the Greek terminationist. The psychologists do not blush to use the word “animist”; they even say “behaviourist.” In my opinion, “scientist” is a gentle-born word alongside of “behaviourist,” which may well have besmirched the pages of NATURE.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SEDGEFIELD, W. The Word “Scientist” or its Substitute. Nature 114, 824 (1924). https://doi.org/10.1038/114824d0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/114824d0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing