Abstract
REGARDING the inquiry contained in your letter, I would say that the word “scientist” has fully established itself in the written and spoken language of scientific workers as well as of non-scientific persons. It is, of course, when one stays to examine it, a hybrid, but like that other hybrid, the mule, it does useful work. After all, there are numbers of hybrid words in our language also doing useful work, and one does not now trouble to look them in the mouth. For example, take the Latin stems with the Greek terminationist. The psychologists do not blush to use the word “animist”; they even say “behaviourist.” In my opinion, “scientist” is a gentle-born word alongside of “behaviourist,” which may well have besmirched the pages of NATURE.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SEDGEFIELD, W. The Word “Scientist” or its Substitute. Nature 114, 824 (1924). https://doi.org/10.1038/114824d0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/114824d0


