Abstract
THE extremely interesting notes by Sir Arthur Schuster in a recent number of NATURE (January 17, p. 87) may possibly leave with the ordinary reader an impression that Balfour Stewart's contributions to the establishment of the laws of natural radiation were slighter than was actually the case. The considered opinion of the late Lord Rayleigh, set out in Phil. Mag., i. 1901, pp. 98–100, or “Scientific Papers”, iv. pp. 404–5, can hardly be gainsaid. In Stewart's discussion of radiation in an isolated enclosure containing moving bodies, his expressed conviction, that the second law of thermodynamics is only satisfied through the action of mechanical forces necessary to maintain the motion, is only turning round the other way the considerations employed by Boltzmann and by Wien long after, who by means of these mechanical forces (namely, the reaction of radiation pressure) combined with the second law of thermodynamics, deduced the law of structure of natural radiation. Reference may also be made to footnotes appended to the reprint of Stokes's cognate papers in “Math. and Phys. Papers,” iv. especially p. 136.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LARMOR, J. Balfour Stewart's Advances in Radiation Theory. Nature 115, 159 (1925). https://doi.org/10.1038/115159b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/115159b0