Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Course of Instability of Elements

Abstract

URANIUM and thorium being the two amongst the old elements which are unstable, and being nearly at the end of the Periodic Table, is there any more reason to regard these as the last to remain unstable, than to regard them as the first to become unstable? If they represent the last to become unstable, we might suppose that all the other elements had passed through an unstable stage and in the course of ages to have become stable, thus throwing the greater part of the earth's history into the past, with less to come in the future. If, however, we suppose that only two elements have reached the unstable stage, all the remainder will have to come to this stage in turn, thus giving to the earth a tremendously long future as compared with that which is past.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MARTIN, E. The Course of Instability of Elements. Nature 116, 866 (1925). https://doi.org/10.1038/116866d0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/116866d0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing