Abstract
URANIUM and thorium being the two amongst the old elements which are unstable, and being nearly at the end of the Periodic Table, is there any more reason to regard these as the last to remain unstable, than to regard them as the first to become unstable? If they represent the last to become unstable, we might suppose that all the other elements had passed through an unstable stage and in the course of ages to have become stable, thus throwing the greater part of the earth's history into the past, with less to come in the future. If, however, we suppose that only two elements have reached the unstable stage, all the remainder will have to come to this stage in turn, thus giving to the earth a tremendously long future as compared with that which is past.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MARTIN, E. The Course of Instability of Elements. Nature 116, 866 (1925). https://doi.org/10.1038/116866d0
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/116866d0


