Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Is Darwinism Dead?

Nature volume 119, page 526 (1927)Cite this article

Abstract

IN NATURE of Feb. 19, Sir Arthur Keith brought against me two specific accusations: (1) That I denied in my book “A Companion” (p. 12) the possibility of birds descending from reptiles; (2) that I had given a false reference to Vialleton's high authority. There was a clear issue: (1) Had I said this? (2) Had I misrepresented my authority?

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Reform Club, Pall Mall, S.W.1

    H. BELLOC

Authors
  1. H. BELLOC
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BELLOC, H. Is Darwinism Dead?. Nature 119, 526 (1927). https://doi.org/10.1038/119526a0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/119526a0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing