Abstract
SINCE Cheshire and Cheyne investigated the cause of foul-brood of bees in England and attributed the etiology of the disease to B. alvei, which is almost invariably found in large numbers in infected larvæ, much Work has been done to corroborate their results. In no case, however, has an isolated culture of B. alvei been known to produce the disease. On the other hand, G. F. White and others have refuted the claim of Cheshire and Cheyne and ascribed infection in this disease to B. pluton. Owing to their inability to cultivate and isolate the organism, however, their claim has remained hypothetical; for it could not be determined whether this organism was itself merely a secondary invader—as they said was B. alvei—or whether the infection was mixed, or whether, indeed, these organisms played any pathological rôle in the disease.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WHARTON, D. Etiology of European Foul-brood of Bees. Nature 120, 297 (1927). https://doi.org/10.1038/120297b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/120297b0


