Abstract
THE suggestion made by Dr. Russell in his letter in NATURE of Feb. 4, that the kilowatt hour with its multiples and submultiples is the best unit of heat, is not new. Some years ago Ostwald proposed the unit of a kilojoule, and recalculated all the thermal data to the new unit. The figures will be found in his “Grundriss der allgemeinen Chemie,” 1909. The reason why such a unit is not adopted in thermochemistry is that all the data would then depend on each redetermination of the mechanical equivalent of heat. The accuracy with which the latter is known probably does not, as yet, exceed one in a thousand, and thermochemists prefer not to have an error of this magnitude involved in determinations which are claimed to have an accuracy of one in ten thousand.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PARTINGTON, J. The Two Calories. Nature 121, 209 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1038/121209c0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/121209c0


