Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Two Calories

Abstract

THE suggestion made by Dr. Russell in his letter in NATURE of Feb. 4, that the kilowatt hour with its multiples and submultiples is the best unit of heat, is not new. Some years ago Ostwald proposed the unit of a kilojoule, and recalculated all the thermal data to the new unit. The figures will be found in his “Grundriss der allgemeinen Chemie,” 1909. The reason why such a unit is not adopted in thermochemistry is that all the data would then depend on each redetermination of the mechanical equivalent of heat. The accuracy with which the latter is known probably does not, as yet, exceed one in a thousand, and thermochemists prefer not to have an error of this magnitude involved in determinations which are claimed to have an accuracy of one in ten thousand.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PARTINGTON, J. The Two Calories. Nature 121, 209 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1038/121209c0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/121209c0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing