Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Science Teaching in Schools

Abstract

MY cordial thanks are due to the writers of the above letters for their welcome support. The evidence I have of the general accuracy of my indictment is so overwhelming that I must ask that it be taken seriously. If anyone will tell me of schoolwork in progress anywhere to teach the elements of true scientific method, as applied to ordinary life and to ourselves, I shall endeavour to see it and be more than glad if I can report that there are exceptions that ‘prove my rule,’ showing that such teaching can be and is given. Probably I differ from most in my definition of ‘scientific method’ and shall not easily be satisfied. Reference is made to the heuristic method. Surely this was ruled out years ago, at least by Mr. Wells, as ‘food unfit for the Gods,’ because of the time needed to digest it. He has never found this, I judge.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

A., H. Science Teaching in Schools. Nature 121, 454–455 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1038/121454b0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/121454b0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing