Abstract
REFERRING to Mr. Keeping's letter on p. 478 of NATURE of Sept. 29, I agree that learners of the elements would be helped by a handier specification for acceleration; but a name for unit velocity would suffice. Speed is a primary apprehension, and it is rather odd that no unit name has been chosen for it; except ‘knot.’ Suppose for a moment that the velocity unit were called a ‘vel’; then acceleration would be in vels per second, and momentum in gram-vels or pound-vels. These are not hopelessly bad: context would show whether feet or centimetres were intended; in any serious non-teaching specification abbreviations are seldom permissible.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LODGE, O. Unit of Acceleration. Nature 122, 573 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1038/122573b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/122573b0