Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Electronic Charge e

Abstract

IN a letter to NATURE of March 2, Dr. R. T. Birge has pointed out the difficulty of reconciling the experimental value of 137·2 of hc/2πe2 with Prof. Eddington's theoretical value of 136. He concludes that it is highly improbable that any of the measurements of the three physical quantities involved could be so much in error. The only other possibility seems to be that the value of we calculate for practically zero field is not the value that should be inserted in obtaining the value of hc/2πe2.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

POOLE, J. The Electronic Charge e. Nature 123, 530 (1929). https://doi.org/10.1038/123530c0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/123530c0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing