Abstract
IT has been pointed out on more than one occasion that, if filterable viruses constitute a group of ultra-microscopic organisms, it is remarkable that no saprophytic forms are known. In Nature of Aug. 17 last (p. 267), Dr. J. J. Davis questions the validity of this argument, at least in the present state of our knowledge. “Until viruses can be known other than by the effects of their parasitism, it would seem to be quite impossible to detect corresponding bodies that are not parasitic,” he says, and “until some method is devised by which the constituents of the virus can be recognised, it would seem to be useless to look for them”.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SAMUEL, G. Nature of Disease-Producing Viruses. Nature 125, 51 (1930). https://doi.org/10.1038/125051b0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/125051b0