Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Boscovich and Theories of Light

Abstract

THE extract from the writings of Boscovich which Prof. Osborne quotes is interesting. Until the reason for the rectilinear propagation of light-waves was explained by the work of Young and Fresnel on interference, the difficulties of an undulatory theory were very great, and it is not surprising that Boscovich, like Newton, “sums up in favour of a corpuscular theory”. His attempt to combine with it some of the advantages of a wave theory as described by Prof. Osborne seems to me less successful than the method adopted by Newton.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DAMPIER-WHETHAM, C. Boscovich and Theories of Light. Nature 126, 351 (1930). https://doi.org/10.1038/126351c0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/126351c0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing