Abstract
IN his address on the decline of determinism,1 Sir Arthur Eddington enunciates a very curious equation. “If the atom has indeterminacy, surely the human mind will have equal indeterminacy: for we can scarcely accept a theory which makes out the mind to be more mechanistic than the atom.” This statement will not bear too close an examination even from a non-quantitative point of view. Thus an attempt by myself to solve even a simple wave equation might lead to any of a large number of results; a similar attempt by Sir Arthur Eddington would lead to the correct solution with a high degree of probability. I do not think that this proves that his mind is more mechanistic than my own, whatever that may mean. Actually it is generally regarded as a compliment to describe a person as reliable, that is, to suggest that his conduct is predictable.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
NATURE, 129, 240; Feb. 13, 1932.
"Crime as Destiny", 1931.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HALDANE, J. Determinism. Nature 129, 315–316 (1932). https://doi.org/10.1038/129315b0
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/129315b0
This article is cited by
-
Intensity Ratio of Fluorescent X-Ray Lines
Nature (1932)