Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Number 60 in Time Measurements

Abstract

WITH reference to the note in NATURE of March 4, p. 299, may I point out that the cycle of 60 years does not appear to date back before the Han dynasty (say 200 B.C.), and that the cycle of 60 before that date only occurs in the actual records as applied to days, probably back to about 2000 B.C. There are traces of a 10-day period in the ritual records and this may predate the 60-day period. T. Fergusson considered the 60-years period to have been borrowed from India and to be the cycle of conjunctions of Jupiter and Saturn in the same geocentric longitude, but beyond the fact that Szuma ch'ien used some queer foreign names for the years of the 60 cycle, there is no real evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CHATLEY, H. Number 60 in Time Measurements. Nature 131, 914 (1933). https://doi.org/10.1038/131914b0

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/131914b0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing